[1].Antrop, M. (2005). From holistic landscape synthesis to transdisciplinary landscape management. In: Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application, B. Tress, G. Tress, G. Fry, P. Opdam, pp.27-50, Wageningen UR Frontis Series No. 12., Springer, Heidelberg.
]2[.Baluch, F. Itti, L. (2011). Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends in Neurosciences, Vol.34,No.4, pp.210-224, ISSN:0166-2236.
]3[.Barak-Erez, D. & Shapira, R. (1999). The Delusion of Symmetric Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.19, No.2, pp.297-312, Online ISSN 1464-3820.
]4[.Bell, P.A., Greene, T.C., Fisher, J.D. & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental Psychology. 5th Edition,Harcourt College Publishers, ISBN:0155080644, USA.
]5[.Berleant, A. (1992). The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press, ISBN: 0-87722-993-7, USA.
]6[.Bishop, I.D. & Rohrmann, B. (2003). Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.65, pp.261-277,ISSN: 0169-2046.
]7[.Burassa, S.C. (1988). Toward a theory of landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning,Vol.15, pp.241-252, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]8[.Cain, R., Jennings, P. & Poxon, J. (2011). The development and application of the emotional dimensions of landscape. Applied Acoustics, In press, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.006.
]9[.Carles, J.L., Barrio, I.L., & de Lucio, J.V. (1999). Sound influence on landscape values. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.43, pp.191-200, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]10[.Carson, E. (2002). Locke’s account of certain and instructive knowledge. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol.10, No.3, pp.359-378, Online ISSN: 1469-3526.
]11[.Chang, H. (2009). Mapping the Web of Landscape Aesthetics: A critical Study of Theoretical Perspectives in Light of Environmental Sustainability. PhD Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Available from:http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/3362.
]12[.Clay, G.R. & Daniel, T.C. (2000). Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.49, pp.1-13, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]13[.Daniel, P. (2008). Kant on the Beautiful: The Interest in Disinterestedness. Date of access: 21/01/2012.
]14[.Daniel, T. C., (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 54, pp. 267-281, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]15[.Daniel, T.C. Meitner, M.M. (2001). Representational validity of landscape visualizations: The effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 21, No.1, pp.61-72, ISSN: 0272-4944.
]16[.Downs, R. N. Stea, D. (1973). Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behavior: Process and Products. In: Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior, Roger M. Downs David Stea, pp. 8-26, Aldine, ISBN: 0202100588, Chicago.
]17[.Dunn, M.C. (1976). Landscape with photographs: testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 4, pp. 15-26.
]18[.Echelberger, H.E. (1979). The semantic differential in landscape research, Proceedings of OurNational Landscape: a conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource, April 23-35, Nevada, pp.524-531.
]19[.Council of Europe, (2000).
European Landscape Convention, Date of access: 15/12/2011 Available from:
http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm.
]20[.Falk, J.H. Balling, J.D. (2010). Evolutionary influence on human landscape preference. Environment & Behavior, Vol.42, No.4, pp. 479-493, Online ISSN: 1552-390X.
]21[.Fenton, D.M. & Reser J.P. (1988). The assessment of landscape quality:an integrative approach. In: Environmental Aesthetics: theory, research & applications, J.L.Nasar, pp.108-119, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521341248, USA.
]22[.Fisher, B.S. & Nasar, J.L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: prospect, refuge and escape. Environment and Behavior, Vol.24, No.1, pp.35-65, ISSN: 0013-9165.
]23[.Forster, P.M. (2010).
A brief introduction to environmental psychology. Date of access: 22/01/2012, Available from:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/45853873/Introduction-to-Environmental-Psychology.
]24[.Galanter, P. (2010). Complexity, Neuroaesthetics, and Computational Aesthetic Evaluation,Proceedings of 13th Generative Art Conference GA2010, pp.400-409, Italy.
]25[.Gibson, J.J. (1986). The theory of affordances. In: The ecological approach to visual perception,J.J.Gibson, pp.127-143, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, ISBN:0898599598, USA.
]26[.Goregenli, M. (2010). اevre psikolojisi: insan-mekan ilişkileri. İstanbul Bilgi ـniversitesi Yayınları, ISBN:978-605-399-171-7, Istanbul.
]27[.Graham, L. (2008). Gestalt theory in interactive media design. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol.2, No.1, pp.1-12, ISSN:1934-7227.
]28[.Gross, S.W. (2002). The neglected programme of aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics,Vol.42, No.4, pp.403-414, Online ISSN 1468-2842.
]29[.Hedfors, P. (2008). Site soundscapes: landscape architecture in the light of sound. VDM Verlag Dr.Müller Aktiengesellschaft Co.KG, ISBN: 9783639094138,Germany.
]30[.Jennings, P. & Cain, R. (2012). A framework for improving urban soundscapes. Applied Acoustics, In press, doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.12.003.
]31[.Kang, J. (2007).Urban Sound Environment. Talor & Francis, ISBN:0-415-35857-4, Great Britain.
]32[.Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1978). Humanscape: environments for people. Duxbury Press, ISBN- 10:0878721630, USA.
]33[.Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. & Ryan, R.L. (1998). With People in Mind. Island Press, ISBN: 1-55963-594-0, USA.
]34[.Kaplan, R.Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University press, ISBN:0521349392, USA.
]35[.Kaplan, S. (1988a). Perception and landscaper: conceptions and misconceptions. In: Environmental Aesthetics: theory, research & applications, J.L.Nasar, pp. 45-55,Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521341248, USA.
]36[.Kaplan, S. (1988b). Where cognition and affect meet: a theoretical analysis of preference. In: Environmental Aesthetics: theory, research & applications, J.L.Nasar, pp. 56-63, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521341248, USA.
]37[.Kaplan, S. (1978). On knowing the environment. In Humanscape: environments for people,pp.54-58, Duxbury Press, ISBN- 10: 0878721630.
]38[.Kaplan, S. (1975). An informal model for the prediction of preference. In: Landscape Asessment: values, perception, and resources, E.H. Zube, R.O. Brush & Fabos, J.G., pp.92-101, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross Inc., ISBN: 0470984236, Pennsylvania.
]39[.Knox, P.L. & Marston, S.A. (2003). Places and Regions in Global Context: Human Geography. 2nd Edition. Pearson Education Inc, ISBN: 0130168319, New Jersey.
]40[.Kohler, W. (1938). Physical Gestalten. In: A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology, W.D. Ellis, pp.17-54, Reprinted by Routledge in 2001, ISBN:0415209579, Great Britain.
]41[.Kroh, D.P. & Gimblett, R.H. (1992). Comparing live experience with pictures in articulating landscape preference. Landscape Research, Vol. 17, pp.58-69.
]42[.Kruse, F.E. (2007). Vital rhythm and temporal form in Langer and Dewey. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.16-26.
]43[.Lee, S.A. (1973). Environmental perception, preferences and the designer, Proccedings of the Lund Conference Architectural Psychology, 26-29 June 1973.
]44[.Lekagul, A. (2002). Toward preservation of the traditional marketplace: A preference study of traditional and modern shopping environments in Bangkok, Thailand. PhD Thesis submitted to Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia.
]45[.Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the philosophy of aesthetics: is landscape quality inherent in the landscape or in the eye of the beholder. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.44, No.4, pp.177-198, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]46[.Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of The City, The MIT Press, ISBN: 0-262-62001-4, USA.
]47[.Lyons, E. (1983). Demographic correlates of landscape preference. Environment & Behavior,Vol.15, No.4, pp.487-511, Online ISSN: 1552-390X.
]48[.Martindale, C. (1996). How can we measure a society’s creativity? In: Dimensions of Creativity, M.A.Boden, pp.159-198, MIT Press, ISBN:0262522195, USA.
]49[.Maulan, S., Sharifi, M.K.M. & Miller, P.A. (2006). Landscape preference and human wellbeing. ALAM CIPTA, International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design Research & Practice, Vol.1, No.1, pp.25-32, ISSN: 1823-7231.
]50[.McVay, S. (1993). A siamese connexion with a plurality of other mortals. In: The Biophilia Hypothesis, Stephen R. Kellert & Edward O. Wilson, pp. 2-19, Island Press, ISBN: 1-55963-147-3, Washington DC.
]51[.Meinig, D.W. (1979). The beholding eye: ten versions of the same scene. In: The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, D.W.Meinig & J. Brinckerhoff, pp.33-48,Oxford University Press, New York.
]52[.Mok, J.H., Landphair, H.C. & Naderi, J.R. (2006). Landscape improvement impacts on roadside safety in Texas. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.78, pp. 263-274, ISSN:0169-2046.
]53[.Nasar, J.L. (1988a). Visual preferences in urban street scenes: a cross-cultural comparison between Japan and The United States. In: Environmental Aesthetics: theory, research & applications, J.L.Nasar, pp.260-274, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521341248,USA.
]54[.Nasar, J.L. (1988b). Perception and evaluation of residential street scenes. In: Environmental Aesthetics: theory, research & applications, J.L.Nasar, pp. 275-289, Cambridge University Press, ISBN: 0521341248, USA.
]55[.Ode, Ǻ. Miller, D. (2011). Analysing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol.38, pp.24-40.
]56[.Pacione, M. (2005). Urban geography: a global perspective. Routledge, 2nd Edition, ISBN: 0-415-34305-4, USA.
]57[.Palmer, J.F. (2003). Research agenda for landscape perception. In: Trends in Landscape Modelling, E.Buchmann & S.Ervin, pp. 163-172, Hebert Wichmann Verlag,
Heidelberg.
]58[.Palmer, J.F. & Hoffman, R.E. (2001). Rating reliability and representational validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.54, pp. 149-161.
]59[.Porteous, J.D. (1996). Environmental aesthetics: ideas, politics and planning. Routledge, ISBN: 0-203-43732-2, London.
]60[.Schafer, R.M. (1977). The tuning of the world. Knopf, ISBN:9780892814558, New York.
]61[.Scott, M.J. & Canter, D.V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 17, pp.263–281, ISSN: 0272-4944.
]62[.Sevenant M. Antrop M. (2011). Landscape Representation Validity:A Comparison between On-site Observations and Photographs with Different Angles of View. Landscape Research, Vol.36, No.3, pp.363-385, ISSN: 0142-6397.
]63[.Shuttleworth, S. (1980). The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 11, pp.61-76.
]64[.Solène, M. (2011). Assessment of urban soundscapes. Organised Sound, Vol.16, No.3, pp.245-255, EISSN: 1469-8153.
]65[.Stewart, T.R., Middleton, P., Downtown, M. Ely, D. (1984). Judgments of photographs vs.field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.4,No.4, pp.283-302, ISSN: 0272-4944.
]66[.Swanwick, C. (2002).
Landscape Character Assessment: A guidance for England and Scotland. On behalf of The Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, UK, Available from:
http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/lcaguidance_tcm6-7460.pdf.
]67[.Szeremeta, B. & Zanin, P.H.T. (2009). Analysis and evaluation of soundscapes in public parks through interviews and measurement of noise. Science of the Total Environment, Vol.407, pp.6143-6149.
]68[.Taylor, J.G, Zube, E.H. & Sell, J.L. (1987). Landscape assessment and perception research methods. In: Methods in Environmental and Behavioral Research, R. B. Bechtel, & R. W. Marans, pp. 361-393, Nostrand Reinhold, ISBN: 0442211570 ,New York.
]69[.Ulrich, R.S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In: The Biophilia Hypothesis, Stephen R. Kellert & Edward O. Wilson, pp. 73-137, Island Press, ISBN: 1-55963-147-3, Washington DC.
]70[.Ulrich, R.S., Simons, R.F., Losito, B.D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M.A. Miles, M.A. & Zelson, M.(1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.11, pp.211-230, ISSN: 0272-4944.
]71[.Ungar, S. (1999). Environmental perception, cognition and appraisal. Environmental Psychology 4 Lecture Notes, Glasgow Caledonian University, Scotland.
]72[.Vandenabeele, B. (2012). Burke and Kant on the Social Nature of Aesthetic Experience. The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke's Philosophical Enquiry, K.Vermeir & M.F.Deckard, pp.177-192 , Springer, e-ISBN: 978-94-007-2102-9.
]73[.Van den Berg, A.E., Kooole, S.L. van den Wulp, N.Y. (2003). Environmental preferenceand restoration: how are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 23,pp. 135-146, ISSN: 0272-4944.
]74[.Wertheimer, M. (1938). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology, W.D. Ellis, pp.71-88, Reprinted by Routledge in 2001, ISBN:0415209579, Great Britain.
]75[.Yang, B. & Brown, T. J. (1992). A cross-cultural comparison of preferences for landscape styles and landscape elements. Environment & Behavior, Vol.24, pp.471-507, Online ISSN: 1552-390X.
]76[.Yang, B. & Kaplan, R. (1990). The perception of landscape style: a cross-cultural comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.19, pp. 251-262, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]77[.Yang, W. & Kang, J. (2005). Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces. Applied Acoustics, Vol.66, pp.211-229, ISSN: 0003-682X.
]78[.Yu, K. (1995). Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese subgroups and Western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.32, No.2, pp. 107-126, ISSN: 0169-2046.
]79[.Yu, L. & Kang, J. (20101). Factors influencing the sound preference in urban open spaces. Applied Acoustics, Vol.71, pp.622-633, ISSN: 0003-682X.
]80[.Zhang, M. & Kang, J. (2007). Towards the evaluation, description and creation of soundscapes in urban open spaces. Environment and Planning B: Planning and
Design, Vol. 34, pp. 68-86, ISSN: 0265-8135.
